In Our Connected World, What If Empathy is Learning?
These days, if you observe a group of students conversing deeply as a team, checking resources on a Chromebook, presenting solutions to a problem in a project, or responding to open ended questions, you might ask yourself: What the heck is going on? Is this learning?
Before going too far, it’s a fair assumption that worksheets, spelling tests, writing, and standardized tests are part of the students’ day also. Traditional, recognizable elements of education are still visible. And an old model prevails: The assumption that individuals operate as a unit separate from each other and the environment, which in turn enables the transmission version of learning — an input-output model in which packets of information enter the brain, form building blocks of knowledge, rewire circuits, stimulate executive function, and…thinking happens. (The conversation trails off at this point because the whole process gets mysterious, especially the thinking part.)
But now, to the new world. Information is everywhere, making it impossible to package. Collaboration and networking are the norm, and even plants communicate with each other. Peer to peer replaces authority. Each time you check your smart phone you tap into the global brain. And when you finally put down the phone, you shake your head: So much going on. In fact, the tightening weave in the global network means that never has there been an era in human history in which so many people learn together.
Education has noticed, a realization driving the move to a personalized, learner-centered, teacher facilitated, applied skills form of schooling, with increased emphasis on teamwork and collaborative project-based work in school, accompanied by a sharp rise in trying to tap deep student attributes such as engagement, motivation, openness, and curiosity.
What this should tell us is that the transmission model has collapsed. Even more, it’s time to acknowledge that living a densely linked life and operating in a non-linear, intimately connected, globally diverse, culturally conflicted world with 16 million text messages exchanged every minute and knowledge itself becoming a social construct mediated by the whole requires new thinking about learning itself.
What will replace the old model? There are three important clues — three sets of data from emerging science — that point us in the direction of a radically new notion of learning in the remainder of the 21st century and beyond.
First, consider that conventional evolutionary theory is being challenged by complexity, which assumes the primary unit of evolution is the organic whole, not the individual. This theory follows the rule of dynamic systems, in which chaotic patterns (and we have plenty now) accelerate until crisis reaches a penultimate stage and chaos resolves itself into a new order.
Second, there is increasing evidence that in our highly connected world the social environment interacts with human consciousness to create a social field of information. Like fish trying to see water, the field is invisible to us, but we learn from the field. It’s now our chief source of curriculum.
Third, experts in the field of social neuroscience assert that our relationship to the field can be mediated through an expression of empathy and openness. That may be why empathy has suddenly morphed beyond a narrow definition as a tolerant attitude into a deep interpersonal skill necessary for effective teaming, customer design, and other aspects of life that require openness to the flow of information.
What does this mean for education? In my view, it’s time to match the emerging science with the tempo of the times and upend established ‘truths’ around ‘building block’ theories of learning. It’s time to act on the assumption that knowledge is flowing through students, not being delivered to them. This is the game-changer. Anything less is a slow dance solution in a rock and roll world. For the foreseeable future, empathy is learning.
This may seem theoretical and far away from present school practices. But recall the complexity approach to evolution: More chaos indicates the problem is intensifying to the point of a sudden shift. We are not as far from a 21st century model of learning as we might believe. In fact, there are at least five ways that schools can get out in front of the shift:
Promote a Holistic, Non-Brain Centric View of Learning. Empathy be a behavior, but it has a physiological underpinning. In an empathetic state, the body relaxes and brain activity shifts to the higher centers. To an extent larger than generally realized, this shift is mediated by the heart. Further, the physiology of the heart — in the form of heart rate variability, which affects the messaging to the brain — is influenced by emotions. All the emotions associated with empathy, such as openness, humility, gratitude, and compassion, affect the heart positively.
View Empathy as the Foundation. Old schemata for learning, such as Bloom’s Taxonomy, need to be replaced by iceberg models that give us better insight into behaviors that matter in the world, including social awareness, self-awareness, and attitudes that lead to connection with others. This includes replacing the term ‘social-emotional’ learning, an industrial hangover from a time in which academic and social skills could be distinguished, with a strengths-based focus that binds intellect, passion, and skillfulness into a whole. Teaching SEL skills is on the rise, but teaching the core strengths — openness, curiosity, and empathy — and acknowledging empathy’s fundamental role in cognition and achievement is the next step.
Turn Empathy into an Outcome. Empathy can be learned, demonstrated, and evaluated, but it needs to be defined in terms deeper than “I like others.” Empathy is the first step in the design process. Empathetic behavior makes teams function better and can be identified in teamwork rubrics as active listening, open body posture, kind critique, and similar behaviors that can be assessed. Learning to be empathetic, however, does require the right conditions–sitting in a row of desks and answering teacher questions doesn’t do it. Empathy is best learned through service or teams in a project-based environment. Â
Continue to Personalize Learning. The exact definition of personalized learning is a work in progress, but is a visible response to our intuition that the old model of learning no longer holds. The more that an individual is not confined to chapters in a text book or a set of lecture notes, and has 24/7 access to a broader field of knowledge, the more that learning becomes personal as well as collectivized. Many choices equal many paths equal multiple ways to become educated. This is a huge challenge for formal education, but unavoidable.
Recognize Teachers as Co-creators. With the learner at the center, the teacher is the facilitator. But education requires a serious build-out of this concept. In the new model, the real teacher is not a single person, but the social field, which leads to learning, but also awakens deeper levels of creativity and a desire for service. In the transmission model, learning is very much geared toward self-fulfillment; in the new model, we can expect empathy to shift the focus to the common good. Teachers will inevitably begin to apply their subject expertise to real-world demands for solutions, innovation, and problem solving. That’s really the outgrowth of an empathic model of learning: To make a positive difference in the world.
